Cumming, G. S. et al. Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature 515, 50–57 (2014).
Cumming, G. S. & Von Cramon-Taubadel, S. Linking economic growth pathways and environmental sustainability by understanding development as alternate social-ecological regimes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115, 9533–9538 (2018).
Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemen, L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 7, 260–272 (2010).
Clapp, J. Financialization, distance and global food politics. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 797–814 (2014).
Crona, B. I. et al. Masked, diluted and drowned out: how global seafood trade weakens signals from marine ecosystems. Fish Fish. 17, 1175–1182 (2016).
United Nations Environment Programme International Resource Panel. Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth (2011).
Srinivasana, U. T. et al. The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 1768–1773 (2008).
Rist, L. et al. Applying resilience thinking to production ecosystems. Ecosphere 5, 1–11 (2014).
Dermody, B. J. et al. A virtual water network of the Roman world. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 5025–5040 (2014).
Maskell, L. C. et al. Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 561–571 (2013).
Potschin, M. B. & Haines-Young, R. H. Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35, 575–594 (2011).
Peng, J. et al. Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: Thresholds identification. Sci. Total Environ. 607–608, 706–714 (2017).
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
Wallace, K. J. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biol. Conserv. 139, 235–246 (2007).
Lee, H. & Lautenbach, S. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 66, 340–351 (2016).
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D. & Gordon, L. J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1394–1404 (2009).
Saidi, N. & Spray, C. Ecosystem services bundles: Challenges and opportunities for implementation and further research. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 113001 (2018).
Cord, A. F. et al. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 264–272 (2017).
Mitsch, W. J. & Gosselink, J. G. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol. Econ. 35, 25–33 (2000).
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 5242–5247 (2010).
Hamann, M., Biggs, R. & Reyers, B. Mapping social-ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use. Glob. Environ. Change 34, 218–226 (2015).
Macklin, M. G. & Lewin, J. The rivers of civilization. Quat. Sci. Rev. 114, 228–244 (2015).
Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).
Stanley, D. J. & Warne, A. G. Sea level and initiation of Predynastic culture in the Nile delta. Nature 363, 435–438 (1993).
Costanza, R. et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 152–158 (2014).
Edmonds, D. A., Caldwell, R. L., Brondizio, E. S. & Siani, S. M. O. Coastal flooding will disproportionately impact people on river deltas. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–8 (2020).
Renaud, F. G. et al. Tipping from the Holocene to the Anthropocene: How threatened are major world deltas? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 644–654 (2013).
Santos, M. J. & Dekker, S. C. Locked‑in and living delta pathways in the Anthropocene. Sci. Rep. 10, 19598 (2020).
Tessler, Z. D. et al. Profiling risk and sustainability in coastal deltas of the world. Science 349, 638–643 (2015).
Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Theobald, D. M., Baruch-Mordo, S. & Kiesecker, J. Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 811–826 (2019).
Seto, K. C. Exploring the dynamics of migration to mega-delta cities in Asia and Africa: Contemporary drivers and future scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 21, S94–S107 (2011).
Carpenter, S. R., Stanley, E. H. & Vander Zanden, M. J. State of the World’s Freshwater Ecosystems: Physical, Chemical, and Biological Changes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, 75–99 (2011).
Dugan, P. J. et al. Fish migration, dams, and loss of ecosystem services in the mekong basin. Ambio 39, 344–348 (2010).
Notebaert, B., Broothaerts, N. & Verstraeten, G. Evidence of anthropogenic tipping points in fluvial dynamics in Europe. Glob. Planet. Change 164, 27–38 (2018).
Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).
Haberl, H. et al. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 12942–12947 (2007).
Minderhoud, P. S. J. et al. The relation between land use and subsidence in the Vietnamese Mekong delta. Sci. Total Environ. 634, 715–726 (2018).
Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).
FAO. AQUASTAT Database. (2022). Available at: https://www.fao.org/aquastat/statistics/query/index.html. (Accessed: 14th February 2022)
Chau, N. D. G., Sebesvari, Z., Amelung, W. & Renaud, F. G. Pesticide pollution of multiple drinking water sources in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: evidence from two provinces. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 9042–9058 (2015).
Phien-wej, N., Giao, P. H. & Nutalaya, P. Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand. Eng. Geol. 82, 187–201 (2006).
Käkönen, M. Mekong Delta at the crossroads: more control or adaptation? Ambio 37, 205–212 (2008).
Smajgl, A. et al. Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 167–174 (2015).
Schneider, P. & Asch, F. Rice production and food security in Asian Mega deltas—A review on characteristics, vulnerabilities and agricultural adaptation options to cope with climate change. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 206, 491–503 (2020).
Gibson, L. et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478, 378–381 (2011).
Davis, M., Faurby, S. & Svenning, J. C. Mammal diversity will take millions of years to recover from the current biodiversity crisis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 11262–11267 (2018).
Arowolo, A. O., Deng, X., Olatunji, O. A. & Obayelu, A. E. Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria. Sci. Total Environ. 636, 597–609 (2018).
Lang, Y. & Song, W. Quantifying and mapping the responses of selected ecosystem services to projected land use changes. Ecol. Indic. 102, 186–198 (2019).
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Isbell, F. Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 10394–10397 (2012).
Liang, J. et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354, aaf8957 (2016).
Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321, 926–929 (2008).
Dalin, C., Konar, M., Hanasaki, N., Rinaldo, A. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 5989–5994 (2012).
Van Asselen, S., Verburg, P. H., Vermaat, J. E. & Janse, J. H. Drivers of wetland conversion: A global meta-analysis. PLoS One 8, e81292 (2013).
Davidson, N. C., Fluet-Chouinard, E. & Finlayson, C. M. Global extent and distribution of wetlands: trends and issues. Mar. Freshw. Res. 69, 620–627 (2018).
Gordon, L. J., Finlayson, C. M. & Falkenmark, M. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric. Water Manag. 97, 512–519 (2010).
Syvitski, J. P. M. & Kettner, A. J. Sediment flux and the anthropocene. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 369, 957–975 (2011).
Nienhuis, J. H. et al. Global-scale human impact on delta morphology has led to net land area gain. Nature 577, 514–518 (2020).
Cinner, J. E. et al. Bright spots among the world’s coral reefs. Nature 535, 416–419 (2016).
Stott, I., Soga, M., Inger, R. & Gaston, K. J. Land sparing is crucial for urban ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 387–393 (2015).
Caldwell, R. L. et al. A global delta dataset and the environmental variables that predict delta formation. Earth Surf. Dyn. Discuss. 7, 773–787 (2019).
Lehner, B., Verdin, K. & Jarvis, A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos (Washington DC) 89, 93–94 (2008).
USGS. HYDRO1k Elevation Derivative Database. https://doi.org/10.5066/F77P8WN0 (2000).
CIESIN – Center for International Earth Science Information Network Columbia University. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) https://doi.org/10.7927/H4JW8BX5 (2018).
Venter, O. et al. Last of the Wild Project, Version 3 (LWP-3): 2009 Human Footprint, 2018 Release. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center https://doi.org/10.7927/H46T0JQ4 (2018).
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–11 (2016).
Zeileis, A., Leisch, F., Hornik, K. & Kleiber, C. strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. J. Stat. Softw. 7, 1–38 (2002).
Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J. & Golub, T. Consensus clustering: A resampling-based method for class discovery and visualization of gene expression microarray data. Mach. Learn. 52, 91–118 (2003).
Reader, M. O. et al. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6346472 (2022).
QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. (2019).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2020).
More Stories
Exploring the Benefits of Cluster Residences
The Impact of Cluster Residences on Property Value
The Role of Cluster Residences in Affordable Housing Solutions